Work Worth Doing: Meet Bob Keeney

Work Worth Doing: Meet Bob Keeney

by Marnie Jones

Robert Keeney is an indispensable member of the Whidbey Institute volunteer team, and frequently comes to the land for a day or a week at a time to build trails, remove hazard trees, clear windfall, and support our land care team with his labor, skill, and wisdom. He’s been coming to Chinook since 2010, and his volunteer hours this year alone add up to about three weeks of full-time service. This week, we had a chance to talk on topics ranging from intercultural friendships and childhood road trips to wildfires and the unknowable future.

Bob helps at the Whidbey Institute with tasks ranging from plumbing to forestry, but he really shines in stewarding our 100 acres of wooded trails. “He always finds a simpler way to do something,” Land Care Coordinator Robert Mellinger said, “and he draws from decades of experience.” Recently, for instance, Bob pulled two trees off roofs using complex rigging and knots he may have learned during a stint as a tugboat deckhand.

“He pays a lot of attention to people’s experiences,” Mellinger went on. “In doing tread work and regrading trails, for instance, he’s thinking of the kinds of people who might use them. Can an elderly person use the trail? A mother with children?”

Staff members appreciate Bob Keeney’s technical skills—his lifetime of experience and his mechanical aptitude—as well as his perception, his powers of observation, and sensitivity for the health of trees and humans alike. “He’s really brilliant at making subtle changes that have a big impact,” said Thomas Anderson, Resident Caretaker. “A lot of the stuff he does is very important but almost invisible.”

Bob said his volunteerism at Chinook stems from a sense that he likes what we’re doing here, and the way we’re doing it. “My personal belief has been that everybody who’s any good at anything ought to float a certain amount of that talent on the water,” he said, “Since the thing I’m best at is being a sort of a forest handyman, that’s what I’ve got to donate.” Bob said his dedication comes not so much from an abundance of time, but from a conviction that this is what he wants to be doing with his life. “Anybody who knew me, and knew all the things I have to do, would say I don’t have the time to be here and do this. They might be right, but I don’t particularly care. If I choose to come here and help you people with a project that I think is worth doing, and I’m working with people that I think are worth knowing, then I’ll do it!”

“A lot of the stuff he does is very important but almost invisible.”

“If you all spent more of your time worried about whether your glasses frames were sufficiently stylish, and your colors were more sufficiently coordinated, and whether your houses were fancy enough for the kind of people you wanted to entertain, I’d probably spend less time here. But no—you do what you do because you think it’s worth doing, and therefore I’m here to do the same.”

“If you all spent more of your time worried about whether your glasses frames were sufficiently stylish, and your colors were more sufficiently coordinated, and whether your houses were fancy enough for the kind of people you wanted to entertain, I’d probably spend less time here. But no—you do what you do because you think it’s worth doing, and therefore I’m here to do the same.”

Bob grew up with a librarian mother, a civil engineer father, and a civil engineer grandfather before him. He and his younger brother were inspired to emulate their dad and grandad. “We spent a lot of time outside, building things,” Bob said. “We grew up country, but my granddad was a country boy too. He had no particular training in Engineering, but he did math on a log-log duplex slide-rule. He could do things on that slide rule I never did figure out.” Bob called his mother’s parenting style “libertarian,” saying, “we could go outside, play in the creek, come in mud up to here and she wasn’t near as mad as . . . well, some kids’ mothers would have completely unspooled.”

Bob’s mother ignited in him a passion for reading which exceeds the ordinary, and which lives in him to this day. “I was an Aspergers kid,” he said, “ and Aspergers kids tend to know all there is to know about something that nobody else gives a hoot about. Since my mother was a librarian, I read very well before I started school. I could read all my textbooks in September and do very well on the tests next spring without ever opening a book again, and without doing homework. You don’t get a grade if you don’t do homework, so I wasn’t much of a student.” Nonetheless, he’s been an extraordinary student of life—from how to get a four-ton fir tree off a two-story roof to how to create community and learn from differences.

Sharing a story from his childhood, Bob explained a friendship which grew up between his father, a U.S. Army Officer, and Sister Catalina of a Filipino Catholic order during World War II. “She once asked my dad why she’d never noticed him saying his prayers,” Bob said. “My dad told her he wasn’t Catholic, and Sister Catalina looked pretty shocked. She asked, “why are you kind to us, then?”

Bob said he was five when he heard this story, and his father’s response has stayed with him to this day. “Dad said, ‘you’re trying to do good in the world. I’m trying to do good in the world. Therefore, we can be friends.’

Sister Catalina became Mother Superior of her order, and she and Bob’s father maintained a friendship for the rest of her life.

Growing up with a librarian and an amateur military historian made its impressions on Bob. He remembers childhood road trips, during which the family “collected” libraries, museums, and national historic battlefields. “It’s a lot easier to understand what happened at Gettysburg if you spend a day and a half walking around Gettysburg and reading the signs,” he said. “I read everything I find with words on it. It takes me a long time to light a fire—I’ve got to read the whole newspaper first.”

On the subject of Fire, Bob shared a more sobering story of how the Taylor Bridge Fire swept through his home near Cle Elum in 2012 while he was away at a Bellevue veterinary clinic with his late dog. “I had 24 acres, with 20 acres of trees,” he said. “I had a forestry plan, an 800 square foot dry cabin, and two shipping containers full of worldly goods. The fire burned it all. I went from having 20 acres of forest to having 20 acres of dead black sticks poking up in the sky.” Bob lost his cabin, his timber, and a great many tools, but also boxes and boxes of beloved books. “I lost every book my grandparents gave me,” he said. “Some I had just read. Some I was still reading. I remember them all.”

Bob said he’ll spend his whole life rebuilding what was lost, but that he sees some good has come of it. “As a result of that fire, I’ve met some real nice people. It’s an ill wind that blows no good.”

“I had 24 acres, with 20 acres of trees. I had a forestry plan, an 800 square foot dry cabin, and two shipping containers full of worldly goods. The fire burned it all. I went from having 20 acres of forest to having 20 acres of dead black sticks poking up in the sky.”

In addition to being an avid reader and forester, Bob is a machinist, model railroader, and great student of nature. “The one youthful statement for which I have absolutely no patience is ‘mom, I’m bored!,’” he said. “The thing is, boredom is a mental condition most easily gotten over by grabbing a book or going outside and looking at something in detail. That’s the whole secret—notice the details! Take a trip. Look out the window. Get off the freeway, take the little roads, and notice! Just notice! What kinds of birds are atop the hills? What kinds are in the valleys? What do the trees do at the tops of the hills, and what do they do at the bottoms?”

“The world is an interesting place. Look at that picture of Earth rising, taken during the lunar landing. It’s one of the most famous photographs that ever was. If you can’t look at the world like that, then go look under a bush. Just start noticing.”

Our interview ended with Bob pointing over my shoulder, out the glass window on the entry door to Thomas Berry Hall’s offices. “There’s a wren behind you,” he said. “Beautiful.” In silence, we watched her—both of us, together, noticing the details.

“Boredom is a mental condition most easily gotten over by grabbing a book or going outside and looking at something in detail. That’s the whole secret—notice the details!”

December 17, 2015

Partner Spotlight: Gordon Watanabe of Personal Leadership Seminars

Gordon Watanabe and I recently sat down to discuss the history and practice of Personal Leadership. Full disclosure: our conversation felt so timely and interesting to me, especially in relation to issues of inclusion, equity, and social justice, that I’ve enrolled as a participant in the upcoming PLS Foundations Program at the Whidbey Institute in February. —Marnie Jones


“Living and working across cultural differences can be both enormously rewarding and tremendously frustrating—all at the same time. Maybe this is because having some idea of what to do when faced with the unfamiliar (intercultural knowledge) and actually doing it (intercultural competence) are two very different things, especially when our deeply held values or sense of identity are affronted by cultural difference.”—Personal Leadership Seminars


Gordon Watanabe teaches practitioners and facilitators of Personal Leadership (PL) in Oregon and Washington and elsewhere around the globe. With PLSeminars co-founders Sheila Ramsey and Barbara Schaetti, he also leads a worldwide community of senior and associate facilitators who teach PL in widely diverse contexts and cultures. In anticipation of two upcoming sessions here at Chinook, we spoke about the PL system, as well as the life experiences that led Gordon into the work.

As a US born, third-generation Japanese American, Gordon has been shaped by intertwining national and cultural identities since childhood. He remembers weekly childhood Sundays at a Japanese-American baptist church in a barrio of Southern California, where he heard from his parents and others of their generation about their adventures at “camp”.

“They put a spin on being interned during World War II,” he said. “My mom was a sophomore then. Camp sounded like it was fun. Then I read a book on American concentration camps in high school, and sat my parents down. I needed to hear another perspective.”

Gordon said that he was able to gain new understanding of his parents’ experiences through the conversation which followed: who his mother and father were, the historical and social contexts they were in, and what it was that made them see the world and their personal history in a less painful way.

Years after this experience, Gordon went with his parents and brother on a roots tour to Japan. “That opened my eyes. I became more proud of my Japanese heritage than I was before, but it made me realize ‘I’m not that’. Learning how American I really am was a fascinating process.”

Gordon remembers additional experiences of being perceived as “other”, or not. He remembers his first year teaching at a rural junior high school, when he drew a very rare 100% parent participation rate in parent-teacher conferences because of the community’s curiosity about his ethnic minority status. In contrast, he remembers the surprise he felt when first visiting Hawaii where, for the first time in his life, he was “passing”. “People assumed I was from there. Asking me for directions! Hawaii is the only place on the planet where I’ve experienced that feeling,” he said. “It has a lot of meaning for me.”

Steeped in these life experiences and in professional experiences which demonstrated the power of intercultural collaboration, Gordon found his career in teaching being shaped by a desire to apply the theoretical background of interculturalism to traditional “diversity” work. He said that working with Jack Condon at what was then the Stanford Institute—now the Summer Institute—for Intercultural Communication—felt like “the whole world opening up.” In a career ranging from teaching science to directing offices of international student affairs, he chose to steer his graduate work away from science education toward the blossoming field of diversity and multicultural education. Later, he served in faculty positions at WSU, as Asian Pacific American Counselor and at Whitworth, as a professor of education and as Special Assistant to the President for Diversity. “We soon changed it to ‘Special Assistant to the President for Intercultural Relations’,” he said.

There’s significance to this titular shift. Relationship, after all, is foundational . . . and how we relate to others, deeply and fundamentally, comes from how we relate to our own internal expectations, responses, and personal, cultural stories.

a4ad0462-0d08-4046-a64c-f3a12af08904

Gordon and Barbara in the early 1990s at the Summer Institute.

 

The Personal Leadership system, developed and refined in the early 1990s at Portland, Oregon’s Summer Institute for Intercultural Communication, is based on what the founders call “a belief that a choice for self-reflection, self-development and creative collaboration is present in all moments, made especially vibrant by the differences in values, world-views and behaviors of those involved.”

PLS was conceived—but not yet refined or named—in 1992 and 1993. Sheila Ramsey was teaching courses at the Summer Institute at the time, while Barbara Schaetti and Gordon Watanabe were coordinating the organization’s intern program. Interpersonal issues, with their roots in culture, family, and personality, frequently arose among interns and faculty from around the world.

“I walked out emotionally exhausted after my first summer,” Gordon said. “We found that even professional interculturalists, who had all the head knowledge about working across difference, started defaulting back to their own styles and cultures as soon as stress was added to the mix.”

Gordon recalled triggers for conflict from his first year at the Summer Institute—some as mundane as asking people to arrange flowers in guest rooms. “We learned that there is a cultural context for what people think is pretty, or aesthetically valuable, in terms of color, picture, flower heights, what a vase should look like, and where it should go,” Gordon said. “Before they were more conscious of what was going on internally, people were just saying NO. That sort of tension began to wear thin after just a little while.” He and Barbara were surprised by the levels of interpersonal conflict at play, and began to search for alternative ways of being together that honored both the self and the other. “We were baffled to see that even faculty were challenged by one another and their differences,” he said.

Soon, they connected with Sheila and the three started looking around, trying to figure out what people were actually doing when they were successfully interacting across differences – not just talking about it but actually doing it.  Their explorations led them to research in leadership development, intercultural communication, educational models, wisdom traditions, positive psychology, and other schools of thought. Eventually they articulated the two principles and six practices which together make up the Personal Leadership approach, and began to apply the work informally at the Summer Institute and elsewhere.

“We took this framework we were developing and applied it to a high-intensity Master’s program at Whitworth,” Gordon said, “then to the intern program at the Summer Institute. It had no name then, but we noticed a gigantic difference in the quality of interactions. We began to realize that this works with anybody, across any culture.” He acknowledged that the system was clearly designed by westerners, in western contexts, but said that others who come from non-western cultures or philosophies have also found the system useful. “We’ve had wonderful conversations with people from all over the world about its utility across national and cultural boundaries,” he said. “People took it the way they needed to, in their own contexts.”

The PL process covers six practices which are at the heart of communicating across difference, and which invoke a fundamental necessity to look inward: to self-reflect, in order to shift from conflict toward understanding. “An individual is responsible for their own responses,” Gordon said, “and those responses may be personality driven, culturally driven, or family driven. Therein lies the opportunity for the person to learn more about oneself.”

Gordon invites students of intercultural communication to stop and ask, “why is it I’m reacting the way I’m reacting? What is going on, and how can I find out more about myself?” At that point, he explains, one can mine the experience of conflict for a greater understanding of one’s own belief systems and their origins—thereby shifting the entire conversation toward a place that is generative, respectful, and welcoming of diverse perspectives.

Now, after 30 years as a teacher and 15 as a college professor, Gordon is semi-retired—holding roles as professor emeritus in education at Whitworth College; faculty of the Fellows Program of the Summer Institute; and a partner in a consulting business. A key takeaway from decades of experience? The value of self-reflection.

“While you may want to learn about somebody else,” he said, “intercultural work is really a matter of learning more about yourself—then you learn to see the other in a very different light.”

December 7, 2015

Meet Our Board: Spotlight on Ted

by Marnie Jackson

I recently had the opportunity to interview Ted Sturdevant, who joined our board in the summer of 2015. With a background in public service and a vision of bringing more wisdom into our collective decision-making, he’s a voice for inclusion, accessibility, and a broader invitation to constituents around the region. Read More →

November 10, 2015

A Message of Thanks-Giving

ProsperA Message of Thanks-Giving

by Marnie Jones

Burundi-based humanitarian Prosper Ndabishuriye wants to see Africa smile again, and he knows how to accomplish his goal. “For the last 22 years my work has been in serving the community. The greatest joy I have discovered is in helping others,” he said. “Imagine the one person you have helped—to build a house, or to have clean water—he is smiling. Imagine the children you are helping to educate. They are smiling. These children are the leaders, parents, and business people of tomorrow. They will be able to help themselves and to help care for their communities. Africa will smile again, because the children are our future and because so many people care.”

Prosper and I recently met in the dining room at Chinook, looking out at green lawns and woodland during one of his regular visits to Whidbey Island and the Whidbey Institute. He filled me in on the work of Jeunesse en Reconstruction du Monde en Destruction (JRMD)/Youth in Reconstruction of a World in Destruction (YRWD), a faith-based non-governmental organization which he founded in 1994 in the midst of genocide. His goal was to promote reconciliation and peace among Hutu and Tutsi people through the rebuilding of hope and homes in the Central-African Republic of Burundi. He found support for this work in an unlikely place when he visited the Puget Sound nine years later.

“This place you see, surrounded by trees, is the heart of the connection we have had in the United States,” he said. “I remember, in November of 2003, telling my friends that Whidbey Island was going to be a source of hope for Burundi. Now, this has become a reality.”

Twelve years ago, Prosper briefly left Burundi to attend back-to-back peace conferences in Washington, D.C. and at the Whidbey Institute in Washington State. Here, he met Peggy Holman, through whom he was introduced to Mike Seymour, who has since become his collaborator, friend, and colleague. Together, they’ve connected Whidbey Island and Washington State donors to Burundi citizens in need. JRMD has built over 3,200 houses in Burundi—each housing seven to ten residents—and Prosper credits supporters in Washington State with funding at least 1000 of these homes. “It is impossible to promote peace, education, reconciliation, development, safety, and health in and among families who do not have the security of any kind of shelter,” Prosper once wrote. “The work of bringing healing and hope to a wounded community  . . . is being done by joining hands together with our partners, friends, and friends of friends.”

Prosper participated in a leadership retreat at the Whidbey Institute last week, but he said the training was not a primary reason for this visit to Whidbey. “I have come back to this place with two messages,” he told me. “First, to tell the people of Whidbey Island and the Whidbey Institute how very grateful I am to them for being a source of hope to the people of Burundi by helping to provide homes, education, and clean water. Second, to tell them how much the work has been progressing with the help of friends from Washington State. We have completed over 3000 homes. We are now providing education to 500 kids—orphans, sick children, and children from underprivileged families. Now, we are providing clean water to families through bio sand filters.”

Prosper explained how impactful American dollars are in Burundi—explaining that $55 funds a water filtration system to serve a family of seven to ten with clean water for thirty years, or that $998 builds a two-bedroom home with a sitting room for a family of the same size—but emphasized that his mission in returning to Whidbey today was not one of solicitation, but of thanks. “My connection with Whidbey has transformed me by showing me how much people care for others. People here are very generous . . . they have heart for other people. What they have already done is really a lot. So yes, you can make a donation if you wish, but I will remain very appreciative for what has already been done.”

Prosper said he continues to live in Burundi, his beloved home, but that he visits Washington State often to bring progress reports and his message of gratitude back to this community. He added that youth have been involved in the work to build homes in Burundi, and that former Governor Christine Gregoire (pictured at right) extended a message of encouragement to Washington State students of the Vancouver School of Arts and Academics and Skyview High School benefit dinner for the AfricaAmericaExchange during her term.

In addition to meeting the former Governor, Prosper, Mike Seymour, and other supporters from Washington State have met with Republic of Burundi President Pierre Nkurunziza (also pictured at right). The reach and impact of JRMD is growing, and today an orphanage, school, and community center is under construction by the organization in Ruhagarika, Cibitoke Province, Republic of Burundi, to serve orphans of civil war and HIV/AIDS. The orphanage, Imuhira Iwacu Village (In Our Home Village), will house 160 children and grow the school’s capacity from 500 to 800 students from surrounding locations.

See photos from JRMD, including the orphanage under construction, here.


If you wish to support the work of Jeunesse en Reconstruction du Monde en Destruction (JRMD)/Youth in Reconstruction of a World in Destruction (YRWD) with a tax-deductible donation, you may give online through Global Giving.

Visit this link to donate specifically to JRMD/YRWD’s work building homes for widows.


You can also donate by writing a check to Heart of Africa, memo JRMD, and mailing it to:
JRMD/YRWD
15127 NE 24th Street, #31
Redmond, WA 98052-5547

Global Giving Foundation and Heart of Africa are registered 501(c)(3) non-profit entities, and donations are fully tax-deductible in the United States.

 

October 16, 2015

Meet Our Board: Spotlight on Dale

by Marnie Jones

Dale Schweppe joined the Whidbey Institute board this summer and has already been working closely with staff to add focus and clarity to our external communications. With a professional background in business development, marketing, and strategy, he brings a talent for big picture thinking. These skills have been honed in the professional realm, but apply equally well to the Institute’s mission-driven work. “My career seems to have been about getting into the strategic vision, then developing the tactics that support it,” he said. Dale’s current professional role, as Director of Business Development at Technocel, engages his strategic and marketing skills as he collaborates closely with the product group in strategy.

Dale rolled up his sleeves early on in his board service, leading the staff and board in an exercise to clarify our mission and vision statements. “When you’re writing for the world,” he said, “you’ve got to condense the language down. It must be clear: ‘This is what we do. This is our vision.'” With Dale’s help, we at the Institute have clearly defined our vision and mission statements, while our resources, practices, and guiding principles—previously conflated—are described elsewhere. Staff, board, and collaborators now have a more precise tool with which to describe and measure what it is we do and seek to accomplish.

Dale’s role with Technocel was preceded by work in brands at Quaker and Dolby, and his career has taken him around the globe. “I’ve been blessed to go around the world, and not on my dime,” he said. “working on projects in the UK changed the country for me—I was no longer a tourist, I was a commuter! What an experience!”

Dale’s husband Jamie, who works in integrative somatics and photography, often travels as well—and, between them, Dale and Jamie spend a fair portion of their time in California and abroad. “We make our travel work together. When he teaches in Hawaii, I go to Hawaii. If it pours the whole time, that’s ok,” Dale said with a laugh.” It’s a Hawaiian rain!”

Dale grew up in Tacoma and Gig Harbor, but said that he’s become a fan of country living in his adult life. “I don’t do well in cities anymore,” he said. “As a child, I came to life when we moved to my great-grandparents’ property in Rosedale, Washington. I went into the woods and blossomed there.” On the subject of their arrival on Whidbey, Dale said that connections from as far away as California, Wisconsin, and Hong Kong all contributed to nudging him and Jamie here. “Circumstance and coincidence brought us to Whidbey, but we couldn’t have been welcomed more fully. The community embraced us almost overnight.”

Dale credits Jamie with helping him grow in his love of nature, as well as with prompting him to envision the next stage of his career outside the boundaries of what he’s experienced thus far. “Jamie once went to an Anna Halprin workshop that changed his whole life trajectory,” Dale said. “His work has meaning—it’s a calling. He helps me ask what I want the rest of my working life to look like. It’s scary to step outside the self-imposed trap—to face that I’m not going to be in corporate land for the rest of my life—but that’s where the awakening lies.”

Dale said that one of the questions he’s asking today is what meaningful work he can do with his next twenty years. “I feel pulled toward working on something that can make a difference in the bigger picture. That’s what drew me to the Whidbey Institute,” he said. “I came to the Winter Gathering, and I brought that program and this organization together in my mind. ‘Who are these people? What is this place? What comes next? What are the distinctions between programs and Institute? How do people come back?'”

The answers to these questions lie at the heart of the Whidbey Institute’s strategic work, and it is both helpful and timely to have Dale with us in this effort. As one of his collaborators on staff, I feel that Dale adds particularly vital expertise to our board—and that his service will be long remembered as a gift to this organization and all of those we serve.

September 5, 2015

Practice and Presence with Inside Passages

Practice and Presence with Inside Passages

By Marnie Jones with Dan Mahle

Whidbey Institute Program Coordinator Dan Mahle recently went on a one week, kayak-based mindfulness retreat for young change-makers, offered by Inside Passages. The longstanding relationship between the Whidbey Institute and Inside Passages founder Kurt Hoelting would have been reason enough for Dan to participate, but he also went into the experience with a personal desire to develop a deeper sense of presence and practice, and to discover insights into his own way of being. It is safe to say that, in the wilds of Alaska, Dan accomplished both.

“This was an opportunity to build a mindfulness practice, to slow down, and to be impacted by the wild, beautiful place we were in,” Dan said. “One of the biggest highlights of my experience was what I didn’t have—no wifi, no cell service, no laptop, no cell phone. Eliminating those things from my life for a week was a major part of the experience, and a prerequisite for exploring the depth of presence that the retreat inspired in me.”

The August Change-Makers Retreat included trip leaders Kurt Hoelting and Maggie Chumbley plus eight participants, who began by island-hopping in Southeast Alaska to reach Kurt’s rustic Petersberg-area lodge. The typical daily schedule included several different meditation and mindfulness practices before a silent breakfast, followed by paddling, yoga, sauna time, and after-dinner conversation before an early bed.

“I’ve done some seated and walking meditation, and I’ve tried qigong before,” Dan said. “I’ve never done them for a week, with a clear daily rhythm. It was new, and it was challenging, but that’s the point! The practice is in becoming mindful of one’s own experience—whatever that is.”

Dan said that the week of paddling, meditation, and rising with the sun brought his mind and body into a new, quieter rhythm. “There’s a part of me that’s addicted to productivity,” he said. “During the retreat, I realized that much of the work I’ve done in my life has come from a place of trying to prove my worth in the world—mostly just to myself. This experience helped me trust much more deeply in my inherent worth—my value and contribution.”

Dan’s reentry into his daily life after the retreat involved a stark awareness of life out of balance, and during our conversation he said he’d be turning off his cell phone notifications and taking other steps out of what he calls our “culture of distraction”.  He spoke to a quality of presence he was able to cultivate in Alaska which enabled him to enjoy some incredible encounters—with the world around him, with wild creatures like hawks and porpoises, and with his own inner world.

“I felt a deep calmness, like my entire system just relaxed. Take a big breath in and exhale very deeply—that’s how I felt for a week,” he said.

When I asked Dan about the shift from Alaska back to Seattle, the Whidbey Institute, and the daily routine, he said the difference in pace was the hardest part. “It’s hard to reconcile the deep peacefulness I felt with being back in my very full life,” he said. “It’s been challenging to prioritize my wellness, exercise, meditation, unscheduled time, and time away from devices. These things feel somewhat out of reach. That’s a sure sign that I need to tune in to myself, and commit the radical act of prioritizing things that make me well!”

Dan said he would recommend a Change-Makers Retreat to any person who risks burnout. “So many of us are working really hard, pushing ourselves to the limit, and we don’t really know how to find a deeper balance. I’d recommend this experience to those who are doing important work in the world, but sometimes feel right on the edge of being overwhelmed.”

Dan said that since the trip, he’s tuned into a sense of abundance, and a sense of place in a world which surrounds and supports him. “I’m trusting that who I am—not just WHAT I DO, but WHO I AM—is valuable, is enough, is worthy . . . and I’m appreciating that there is a deeper, fuller, richer reality surrounding us. We can become present to it, and engage with it, when we are willing to slow down our pace. I’ve realized that everything people say they miss or long for in their lives—joy, happiness, peace, connection, and intimacy with the world—all of that is possible in any moment.”

To learn more about Inside Passages, visit their website. Photos courtesy Inside Passages.

September 5, 2015

Women of Color Speak Out

Changing the Climate on Climate Change
by Marnie Jones with Yin Yu and Stina Janssen

Cascadia Climate Collaborative held a panel discussion entitled Women of Color Speak Out at Town Hall in Seattle. Panelists Sarra Tekola, Zarna Joshi, Afrin Sopariwala, and Yin Yu discussed the vital role of women of color in the environmental rights movement in a far-ranging conversation which touched on climate change as an extension of colonialism; big industry’s divide and conquer strategies; diversionary tactics and the “plastic kayak” objection; emotional resilience and ethical responsiveness in the face of grueling scientific evidence; the role of diet in greenhouse gas emissions; the difference between tokenization and solidarity; karma and the human capacity for compassion; the power of a maternal, human response; and the importance of speaking from the heart about what we love and are in danger of losing.

The event was sponsored by ShellNo Action Counsel and Backbone Campaign with Kshama Savant Solidarity Fund, Greenpeace, Climate Solutions, Yes! Magazine, Central Co-Op, and Got Green, with catering by Mayuri and chai from Traveler’s Thali House. Other support came from Mike McGinn and friends, who managed the box office.

The event was recorded for broadcast by the Seattle Channel, and Sydney Brownstone, a reporter with the Stranger, live tweeted the event.  Mick McCormick recorded the event for his radio and public access TV shows, and Charles Conatzer and Johnny Crisceone recorded for live stream and post production videos. Alex Garland, Michael Moynihan, and Marnie Jones took photos.

August 5, 2015

An Open Letter to the Whidbey Institute Community

An Open Letter to the Whidbey Institute Community

by Heather Johnson

I am honored to serve as Executive Director of the Whidbey Institute. I have profound gratitude for this organization and for the many people who have brought it to this place of health and relevance in meeting the world’s greatest challenges.

The Whidbey Institute is now harvesting what has been sown by past leadership, donors, staff, and volunteers. Many have walked with the organization, sometimes in the face of seemingly insurmountable challenges, to reach this place of engaged, impactful presence. Our remarkable, committed board and caring, creative staff continue to nurture a community of Whidbey Institute contributors and participants who see the very real impact of this organization as it lives out its fundamental mission.

It is with excitement and gratitude that I step into this role, and into this moment of possibility. Today, I wish to speak to the deep purpose of this organization which has helped shape me as much as I have helped shape it during my five years here.

Each of us has our own unique relationship with the Whidbey Institute. For me, it is more than a beloved place. It is more than a conference and retreat venue, and more than a community of learners and leaders.  I have come to know the Whidbey Institute as a hearth around which we gather—one that holds us together in our collective and individual development, inviting us to meet the deep challenges of our time. The Whidbey Institute is a home for the Great Work.

Finding a simple way to express the purpose of the Institute is a task that has worked me, and many others, for years. Rather than swim in the echo chamber of word chasing, I want to speak to the meaning behind the words, and to explore our unique role in this vital moment of our shared human story.

What is “the Great Work of our time”? Thomas Berry wrote, “history is governed by those overarching movements that give shape and meaning to life by relating the human venture to the larger destinies of the universe. Creating such a movement might be called the Great Work of a people. . . . the Great Work now . . . is to carry out the transition from a period of human devastation of the Earth to a period when humans would be present to the planet in a mutually beneficial manner.”

To specifically name the “Great Work of our time” has proven difficult. In Joanna Macy’s words, “it’s been called the Ecological Revolution, the Sustainability Revolution, even the Necessary Revolution. We call it the Great Turning.” A movement of movements, this one is anchored in the dignity inherent in all of life, or in Berry’s words, recognizing that “the universe is a communion of subjects, not a collection of objects.”

When I view this movement from a meta-level, I am in awe of what has emerged in just five decades. I can’t help but see an expression equal to the force of life itself, working on behalf of life, unfolding in momentous waves.

The first wave arose in response to growing environmental devastation and social maladies. We gained a collective awareness that we, as humanity, have been killing the planet and ourselves through the ways in which many of us live. A name for this wave: Waking Up.

The second wave emerged as broad exploration of how we might live differently. In recognition of this challenge as a human problem, more than simply an environmental one, we engaged as a species in inquiry around all realms of human existence: spiritual, psychological, cultural, social, scientific, economic, technological, political, and industrial. This wave is: Learning.

Third, we see the emergence of widespread action to implement change across all human systems, accompanied with the awareness that this work must take place at scale, at pace, and in response to urgent challenges. A name for this wave: Living.

Many of us are waking up, learning, and dedicating our days to living in a mutually beneficial manner with the planet.

We face daunting fears and realities in this work. Many of us question whether the increases in harm outpace the implementation of solutions at an irrecoverable rate, whether the damage is already too extreme, whether said “solutions” are even solutions at all— indeed, whether humanity is fundamentally capable of moving beyond our destructive habits. There is grief in response to our collective losses, and fear of the consequences already coming and yet to be experienced.

Moving with these realities and fears, what is there to do? We simply contribute what we sense is somehow ours to do. I am mindful of the words of Václav Havel: “Hope is definitely not the same thing as optimism. It is not the conviction that something will turn out well, but the certainty that something makes sense, regardless of how it turns out.”

Regardless of our best intentions, this work has shadows. One of the more perplexing shadows lies in the notion that the work is about awakening them, educating them, getting them to believe and behave differently.  More directly stated, the troubling statement might read as, “we have found a right answer— if they would change, we would be ok.” This is a subtle pattern arising when “like-minded” people come together, learn together, and find solace with one another. It can grow into a crusade mindset, or the belief that the answer to the problem is to indoctrinate the other into the right shared ideology.

There is something very human about “othering.” Us-and-them mindset has served important evolutionary purposes, but it will not serve to address the challenges we face in this time. We all carry constructs from the meaning-making structures in which we are steeped— cultural, racial, religious, familial, generational— which allow us to see the world and our place in it in unique ways. These can also make us blind to perspectives beyond our own. We are all, to some degree, in over our heads, doing our best to navigate being human in a changing world.

If the foundation of the Great Work is inherent dignity, then seeing other human beings as objects to convert is incongruous with the Great Work. We cannot move forward by objectifying some of us—even in fear, anger, or hurt. This movement will require dignity, respect, action, courage, invitation, inquiry, and humility.

To be with others in this work is meaningful beyond words. I experience extraordinary delight as a member of this team. My colleagues and our community offer me challenge, support, and learning opportunities that stretch the very fabric of my being.

Through our shared love of this place, may we find ways of being and doing together, abiding in difference, and recognizing one another’s inherent dignity. May we step into our work fully, together, and “be present to the planet in a mutually beneficial manner.”

August 3, 2015

A conversation with Dan McKee

2015 marks the 20th anniversary of Warrior Monk, and these two decades have encompassed more than 100 retreats. When the program returns to the Whidbey Institute from September 23—27, I plan to participate. In preparation for my time in the retreat, I recently spoke with program facilitator Dan McKee about what to expect. Here is that conversation.  —Marnie Jones

________

peoplehalosJulyAt the Whidbey Institute, we consider ourselves a “community of leaders.” To me, that means a commitment to being my best self and courageously seeking my own, passionate, engaged place in the work we share. How would a program like the Warrior Monk Retreat serve me in this effort?

 
DAn

It seems to me that regardless of our desire, and even our deep commitments, most of us can use help in evoking that “best self” and sustaining how well it shows up in the face of stress, busy-ness and doubt. In this work, we get to unwire some of the self-limiting beliefs about ourselves that hold us back from the level of impact our hearts and values call us into. I’ve seen hundreds of folks over the years come out of the retreat with much sharper clarity and resolution about what their “passionate, engaged place” is. Some are quite surprised that their “work in the world” has shifted once they come more deeply into relationship with lost and beautiful parts of themselves.

The deep work, combined with the restoration and support of an intimately engaged group over five days, seems helpful in finding the sweet spot of purpose and engagement. 

I’ve found it’s also a matter of time and how well and where we focus our attention.  Many of us have crafted our lives in ways that may have served us well until this moment, yet don’t leave us able to fully show up for what we find now matters most to us. This can mean devotion to our most important relationships as well as to our work in the world. This is part of the “Warrior” aspect of Warrior Monk—calling up the courage, discernment and action needed to live daily with open-hearted purpose. 

Our work creates inner shifts, supported by tools for limiting distraction and creating more focus. To this we add follow-up care to support each other’s mission and happiness practices.

 ________

• Personal development work is just part of what we each need to do—we also need to practice caring for the needs of our communities at large. How do the two go hand in hand? 

• In my experience they’re not separable. My favorite quote on our Warrior Monk website is “I awaken each morning torn between a desire to save the world and a desire to savor the world. This makes it hard to plan the day.”  ( E.B. White )

Sometimes we need the personal work that confirms our basic goodness and self-appreciation in order to really be effective at caring for community—bringing more focused power and grace to our service. 

Also, learning to not take oneself so seriously can go a long way in paradoxically making one’s work more impactful. So, we make sure to have some fun in this retreat, adding more humanity and playfulness to this important and serious existence.

________

• I feel a strong sense of purpose, and a strong alignment between my personal mission and my work, but I struggle with being in my body. I find meditation difficult . . . I squirm and my mind wanders. Would I benefit from a program like this? 

• Well, sometimes this happens for me, after nearly 40 years of meditating! Warrior Monk is not a full-blown meditation retreat, but we teach and use it enough to ground the deep work in the retreat and give a taste of the deeper quiet we each have residing inside us. Being able to access this on a regular basis is a critical skill—one which I believe most change-agents and just generally kind people possess. 

Many people report experiencing meditation differently during and after their Warrior Monk experience. Over 20 years, we’ve tailored this offering to include a certain amount of meditation, integrating with the other rich experiences, and inside a connected community over five days. We make meditation very user-friendly and practical—a true practice of self-compassion and empowerment.

________

• It’s the height of summer—the birds are singing, the trees are alive with color, and signs of life are everywhere outside. How does the 100 acres of Chinook connect with the inner work of Warrior Monk?

• We only hold Warrior Monk retreats in beautiful and quiet natural settings like Chinook. Whether a participant is walking quietly in the woods while integrating huge shifts or simply looking out the window during a tender and deep moment inside the circle, the Chinook land is a necessary co-facilitator in this process.

________

• I’m a person who feels compassion deeply—for humans, for other animals, for ecosystems. Sometimes, I experience it as guilt, for not being able to fix the world. Does this program offer insight through which I might cultivate greater self-compassion?
• Most definitely, though I’d say that it has little to do with insight. It’s really a place I see folks arrive at in their heart and mind—a form of presence we find as a result of deep work and self care. 

The work, play, and quiet inner revolution that occur during this program not only feed this needed compassion and acceptance of self you speak of, but also serve to provoke and evoke our greater gifts and contributions.  Combine that with the simple but powerful ability to just be more present, and a lot of the other chatter about whether we’re enough or doing enough significantly drops, or falls away. 

________

• Five days and four nights is a big commitment, in light of the needs of work, family, and community. What is the value in this stretch of time away?

• I’m very sensitive to the challenge you speak of. It’s a great privilege to be able to “retreat” from our lives to focus on ourselves, one that most people don’t enjoy. That’s part of what drives me to make sure we’re using this time to empower missions of service, in addition to healing and restoring ourselves.

Something different happens when we spend four nights in a full-immersion —something two or three day workshops and retreats can’t quite create. It’s part of what allows this work to be authentic, lasting, next-stage development work as opposed to a heightened state that fades away. We really are restoring and building our ability to return to work, family, community, and service to ourselves and others with greater peace, grace, joy, and effectiveness. 

July 16, 2015

Meet Our Board: Spotlight on Dorothy

Board member Dorothy Baumgartner recently took time to talk with us about work, life, and her service to the Whidbey Institute. She said she’s been inspired by the collaborations that happen at the Whidbey Institute, and the sense that this is a place where people can convene, get support, and feel inspired by others.

“I see the momentum that can develop when people inspired to change get together. It’s catalytic,” she said. “The Whidbey Institute has been a beacon—a place where there’s possibility—a holder of hope for what might happen.”

Dorothy joined the team in 2012, and was involved early on in governance, helping to update, synthesize, and clarify policies and procedures. She also helped bring a talented group of additions onboard the team in early 2013, including Cole, Sheryl, Christie, and Hilary. “We worked hard to nurture them, communicate well, and bring them on effectively so that they could be ready to go with a good sense of the work,” she said. That work paid off in spades, making the 2013-14 board a very successful and impactful one.

Dorothy has a decade’s experience in organizational leadership and design, but says her passion has been in higher education. “It’s is a place where significant change can happen,” she said. “It’s a nexus of possibility in leadership development for the next generation.” She’s currently working at University of Washington, Bothell as Director of the Student Success Center.

“I came back to higher education looking for a place where I could do integrative work,” Dorothy said. “We’re trying to help our learners really connect. They’re here not just to get a degree, but to make choices which attach to value, meaning, and purpose. Our work is to help them become more clear about those things that they wouldn’t get in a more traditional educational setting.”

In addition to work and volunteering, Dorothy sings with Island Consort, a semi-professional group, and is very invested in her family. She is rightfully very proud of her two teen daughters, Kari and Annika, who both attend South Whidbey High School. Last summer, Annika’s robotics team traveled to Romania and won the high school division of the Black Sea International ROV Competition and Exhibition—Europe’s largest underwater robotics competition. Now, she and her peers are helping to inspire S.T.E.M. education for girls around the world. Meanwhile, Kara is co-leading a team of S.W.H.S. students working through the International Business Assistance Program to help a group of people in Nigeria launch a food project.

“The world is so much smaller for our children and youth,” Dorothy said. “There are so many opportunities for them to engage in impactful ways.”

July 3, 2015